Market Note · 11 October 2026
Fewer Than 1 in 8 OASIS+ Holders Has a Task Order
GSA's current OASIS+ roster lists 2,338 companies. 283 of them have received a task order. In FY2026, the vehicle's first full year, task orders under their contracts reached $1.04 billion, and ten companies took 42% of the October–May dollars. Here is how the orders spread across the pools, and how fast they are growing.
Intelligent Win · Market Intelligence — measured on intelligent.win’s contract corpus.
GSA’s current roster lists 2,338 companies holding 3,931 OASIS+ contracts across six pools. As of the 6 September 2026 federal data release, 283 of those companies (12.1%) have received at least one task order since the first one was recorded in December 2024.
Every dollar figure in this note covers task orders placed under the contracts on GSA’s current roster. The federal contract record also shows 64 more companies with OASIS+ contracts that are not on that roster; they are outside these figures.
In FY2026, the vehicle’s first full year, agencies obligated $1.04 billion on 396 task orders under those contracts. The growth shows best in a like-for-like window. From October through May, FY2025 recorded $42.5 million; the same months of FY2026 recorded $698.5 million.
The money is not spread evenly. Ten companies took 41.7% of the October–May FY2026 dollars.
Defense orders reach the public record about 90 days after they are signed, so June through August defense orders arrive with the mid-October release. The FY2026 company and order counts here can only go up.
OASIS+ holder companies on GSA's current roster and task orders under their contracts, as of the 6 September 2026 federal data release.
Across the pools
Counted by contract rather than company, 274 of the 3,931 holder contracts (7.0%) had task-order obligation actions in FY2026. The 8(a) pool ran highest at 9.2%. The HUBZone and Women-Owned pools ran lowest, at 3.3% and 2.9%.
| Pool | Holder contracts | With FY2026 task-order obligation actions | Share | FY2026 net obligations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small Business | 1,625 | 118 | 7.3% | $439.9M |
| Unrestricted | 719 | 58 | 8.1% | $363.8M |
| 8(a) | 498 | 46 | 9.2% | $135.6M |
| Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned | 482 | 34 | 7.1% | $86.7M |
| Women-Owned | 455 | 13 | 2.9% | $11.8M |
| HUBZone | 152 | 5 | 3.3% | $3.6M |
| All | 3,931 | 274 | 7.0% | $1,041.4M |
The company count and the contract count differ because about half the holders sit in more than one pool: 1,189 companies hold one OASIS+ contract, and 1,149 hold two to five.
Growing fast from a small start
The first OASIS+ task order on the record was signed in December 2024, so FY2025 was a start-up year: $403.0 million on 185 task orders to 139 companies, almost all of it after May. Over October–May, FY2025 recorded $42.5 million across 34 companies. The same months of FY2026 recorded $698.5 million across 191 companies.
Defense placed most of it. Of the October–May FY2026 dollars, $536.4 million (76.8%) came from the Department of Defense. Through 4 September, Homeland Security placed the most task orders of any civilian department (113), ahead of Health and Human Services (27) and GSA itself (17).
Where the money went
Ten companies took 41.7% of the October–May FY2026 dollars and 25 took 63.6%. Large orders carry much of it: through 4 September, 23 task orders of $10 million or more accounted for 45.0% of FY2026 dollars, while 208 of the 396 were under $1 million.
The ten companies below are ranked by net obligations on task orders under their OASIS+ roster contracts from October 2025 through May 2026, as of the 6 September 2026 federal data release.
| Rank | Company (as registered) | Oct–May FY2026 task-order obligations | Share of $698.5M | Task orders |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Odyssey Systems Consulting Group, Ltd. | $84.6M | 12.1% | 3 |
| 2 | Credence Management Solutions LLC | $32.8M | 4.7% | 4 |
| 3 | Leidos, Inc. | $32.2M | 4.6% | 1 |
| 4 | Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. | $25.8M | 3.7% | 5 |
| 5 | Science Applications International Corporation | $25.0M | 3.6% | 1 |
| 6 | Deloitte Consulting LLP | $22.4M | 3.2% | 10 |
| 7 | OST Inc. | $18.8M | 2.7% | 1 |
| 8 | Great Hill Solutions, LLC | $17.7M | 2.5% | 4 |
| 9 | Techximius Corporation | $17.0M | 2.4% | 1 |
| 10 | ISYS, Incorporated | $15.4M | 2.2% | 2 |
Together these ten took 41.7% of October–May FY2026 OASIS+ task-order dollars; the largest 25 took 63.6%.
The first thing we did was try to break it
- New orders only. Counting only companies that received a brand-new task order in FY2026, not obligations added to an earlier one: 182 companies (7.8%).
- Net positive only. Counting only companies whose FY2026 task-order obligations net above zero: 234.
- Without the newest holders. Many contracts were awarded recently and have had little time to win work. Restricting to companies holding a contract awarded before FY2026: 275 of 2,209 have received a task order (12.4%), the same rate as the full roster.
- The whole vehicle, not just the roster. Adding the 64 companies whose OASIS+ contracts appear in the federal record but not on GSA’s current roster gives 285 of 2,402 with a task order, about 11.9%, still under one in eight.
Every version lands between about one holder in thirteen and one in eight.
What this does and does not say
It says that, so far, most companies on GSA’s OASIS+ roster have no task order under it, that FY2026 activity is far above FY2025’s start-up year, and that a small group of holders took a large share of the money.
It does not say any particular holder will or will not win work. Orders can take years to arrive on a vehicle meant to run more than a decade, and a holder can win work on other vehicles that this count does not see. It also says nothing about why an order went to whom.
Every OASIS+ holder has its own page on the platform: its pools, its task orders and who it competes against.
These numbers came out of the platform, not a spreadsheet.
The same contract corpus behind this note — 2.6 million contracts, reconciled against the government’s own published totals before anything publishes — is what the product runs on. If you want to see how it’s assembled and checked, that’s written up in full.