Built by federal capture operators. Two decades, every agency.

Competitive intelligence for federal capture

Your next pursuit, already researched.

How much of your capture week goes to finding the data? Intelligent Win has already found it: who you are up against, what they have actually been paid to do, how the buying office buys, and who else could compete. Open it, and spend your time on the decision.

Every company has a capability statement. We built the other one: what they have actually been paid to do, award by award.

In today. 14 days of full Growth access, every tool, no card. Nothing charges unless you choose a plan.

55,690
Competitors and partners, already profiled
Active federal services contractors, side by side
2,650,747
Contracts, every mod in order
224,477 still being performed
No more rebuilding a contract history by hand
22,614
Buying offices, and how each one buys
Who wins there, how hard it competes, what is expiring
3,047,746
Demonstrated capabilities
Each one tied to the award behind it, across 1,011,617 awards

Counts as of the 6 September 2026 federal data release. Refreshed every month.

Built by people who run federal capture for a living. Two decades leading capture across the government, for first-award small businesses and the primes they team with.

Built To Hold Up In The Room

Put it in the gate deck. It will hold up.

Every number you take into a review has to survive the first hard question. Ours are checked to the dollar before you ever see them, every capability opens to the award behind it, and where the evidence runs thin the page says so. Nobody in the room gets blindsided.

·Every capability opens to the award that proves it.
·No scores, no guesses. You see the evidence and make the call.
Reconciliation Check · Contract 47QFCA24F0014
ContractorGeneral Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
Intelligent Win: obligated to date$70,283,287
USASpending.gov: obligated to date$70,283,287
19 transactions reconciledBase award → Mod 18
✓  Every transaction matches the public record to the dollar, Mod 18 included, loaded on our September refresh.

A real, public contract, not a sample. Figures checked against USASpending.gov on 23 Sept 2026; look it up yourself.

Demonstrated Capabilities

Three million things these companies have actually done.

Search by the work a company has done, not the keywords it put on its website. 3,047,746 capabilities, each tied to the award where the company did the work and sorted the same way for everyone, so a competitor and a teaming partner finally compare on the same terms. Click one and the award is right there.

3,047,746
Demonstrated capabilities, mapped to each company
Not a company’s claim. Actual performance on contract.
1,011,617
Federal awards the evidence is built on
55,690
Companies in the universe

Some awards carry more detail than others. Where the government published a full scope document, we read that too.

Counts as of the 6 September 2026 federal data release. Refreshed on a monthly cycle.

Company Intelligence

Size up any competitor or partner in one page.

More than 55,000 companies: every active federal services contractor, not just the ones on a vehicle. Identity, capabilities ranked by evidence, prime and subcontract revenue stacked and reconciled, customer base, leadership sourced from federal filings, and a growth trajectory grounded in the record, not a guess. And when a company holds GSA MAS or OASIS+, its position there is one click deep.

“Active” here means a USASpending-recorded federal services awardee: current or prior fiscal year, unexpired period of performance, valid UEI.

Beyond those, every company in the government’s own SAM registration file has a page here (888,631 of them, 797,569 currently active), searchable by name or by the name it does business as. You get its registration, where it is, and any subcontract work we can see, even where there isn’t enough award history to build a full profile. Active federal services contractors get the full profile. Every other registrant gets a registration page. Either way, the company you know exists is here.

Product images throughout this page are real captures of the live platform, run over sample data. Each one carries its own note saying what in it is real and what is not.

intelligent.win/company/M4RD8ANF57XK

The company record: identity, KPI strip, tracked revenue, capabilities ranked by evidence, customer base, prime and subcontract history, vehicles, leadership, trajectory and activity. One page, top to bottom.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

Showing the top of the page. Full capture 6,174px tall, expand for all of it.

Customer Intelligence · New

Walk into the buying office knowing how it buys.

Open any federal buying office and see who wins there, how they buy, how competitive the work is, and every active contract, with the government point of contact where one’s on file. Look at it by who awards the work or who funds it, over the last five years or the current one.

intelligent.win/customer/47QFCA

A buying office: who wins here, how they buy, what is expiring, and the contacts on the record. Awarding and funding are shown as separate lenses, never merged.

In this image: a real buying office, with real federal obligation figures behind it. The vendor names beside them are fictional, the contract numbers are altered, and the named contacts are invented.

Showing the top of the page. Full capture 2,706px tall, expand for all of it.

Federal Services Leaderboard

See where you rank.

Every active federal services contractor, ranked by real, funded obligations: five boards (Total, plus Large $250M+, Mid-Cap $100M to $250M, Small $25M to $100M, and Challenger under $25M), filterable by SDVOSB, WOSB, HUBZone, and 8(a) certification, ranked monthly from the federal record. We show the certifications and the government’s own size determinations as evidence; we don’t tell you a company is small. That’s a call with legal weight, and it’s yours to make.

intelligent.win/leaderboard

Ranked by actually-funded federal services obligations, baked monthly and frozen. Five boards, three time lenses, and every socio designation as a filter rather than a separate table.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

Showing the top of the page. Full capture 5,529px tall, expand for all of it.

Contract-Level Detail · New

The whole life of a contract, on one page.

Every modification in order, whether it was competed, who to call, and the vehicle it rode in on: the record a capture lead actually needs, without ten browser tabs.

intelligent.win/contract/FA862224F8799

One contract, whole: every modification in order, competition posture, the vehicle it rode in on, period of performance, and the office that bought it.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

Showing the top of the page. Full capture 3,229px tall, expand for all of it.

Justifications & Approvals · New

Until now, you found a J&A by tripping over it.

Every reason the government gave for not competing a contract.

When a contracting office decides not to compete something — a sole source, a ceiling increase, an extension, a fair-opportunity exception on an IDIQ — it has to write down why, and it publishes it. That document is a Justification & Approval. We collect them and put them in one searchable place: the authority cited, the office, the date it posted, and the government’s own sentence describing the grounds, quoted as written.

Read it for what it is. A J&A is a published record of a decision the office had already made, and usually already signed. We show that it was posted and reproduce the government’s words. We don’t tell you the contract was extended, that the recompete is off, or what any of it means for your pursuit.

Authority cited
10 U.S.C. / FAR citation, as filed
Which office
The buying office, and the date it posted — we don’t publish who signed a justification
Grounds, quoted
The government’s own sentence, verbatim
Coverage, up front

Here are the three numbers: a justification reaches roughly 6% of the material ($1M+) federal services contracts in a year — one gets published only when an office decides not to compete something, which is the minority of what it does; about a third of them name the affected contract in a form we can resolve; and of the ones that arrive with a document, one in three of those documents can’t be read at all — the redaction is done by printing and re-scanning, which destroys the text. An empty result is an answer about your filters, not proof the government did nothing.

intelligent.win/justifications

Justifications and approvals the government has already published — sole source, ceiling increases, extensions and fair-opportunity decisions, all searchable instead of stumbled upon.

In this image: real published justifications — the office, the authority and the government’s own grounds, quoted as filed. Company names are fictional and the contract numbers are altered.

Showing the top of the page — full capture 4,899px tall, expand for all of it.

Your Capture Process, Built In

Make it yours.

Four things you keep. Private by default, shared only when you say so.

Watch a company — star it from a search result, a browse row, or its own profile, and it lands on your watchlist. Pursue a contract — star it the same way, and it lands on your pursuits list with the incumbent, both buying offices, the ceiling, and how much runway is actually left before recompete. Note anything — a company, a contract, an opportunity, a buying office, a vehicle, a consortium, an OT award — tagged by what that record actually is to you: Competitor or Teaming Partner on a company, Pursuing — Prime on a contract, Current Customer on an office. Own a company — put your name on the account you’re driving, so nobody on the team works it twice.

Sharing a note is one toggle, with one confirmation that tells you exactly who’s about to see it — your organization, the people on your account right now, never a network or other customers. Every note starts private and stays that way until you choose to share it, and you can make it private again whenever you want. @mention a teammate and they get an email pointing them at the record — and mentioning someone on a private note opens it to your whole organization, not just to them. Before you send it, not after. Someone who leaves your organization stops seeing shared notes the moment their membership does.

It’s somewhere to keep your work. Nothing here nags you. Apart from account, billing and service notices, two things can put mail in your inbox, and you control both: a teammate @mentioning you, and the monthly change digest — off until you switch it on.

And it leaves with you — a company profile as a Word document, a ranking as a one-page fact sheet, a solicitation’s requirements as a spreadsheet with your team’s columns left blank, or any result list as it stands on screen.

intelligent.win/watchlist

Companies you are watching — where each one sits, what it averages in federal revenue, the day you starred it, and how many of your own notes are attached to it.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

The whole page — full capture 1,920 × 1,080. Expand to read it.
intelligent.win/pursuits

Contracts you are going after — the incumbent, both buying offices, the ceiling and how much runway is actually left. Red inside 90 days; where an option period is still on the record, the current period end is named underneath it.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

The whole page — full capture 1,920 × 1,080. Expand to read it.

Intelligence Tools

Six questions you can’t answer with a search box.

Lookups tell you what happened. These tell you what to do about it — whether you can actually cover a requirement, whether a recompete is worth your time, how big a market really is before you chase it, how you stack up against the company you keep losing to, what this work is really costing per hour billed, and where your own demonstrated capabilities are already a fit no search box would surface. Every one of them shows its work: the evidence, the window it was measured over, and where the record runs out.

Included with Growth and Enterprise accounts.

Can you actually cover this requirement?

Put a contract or a solicitation on one side and a company on the other — yours, a competitor’s, or a team you’re putting together — and get a line-by-line read on every capability the work needs: covered, partial, gap, or unknown. Where there’s a gap, the same screen ranks companies that have demonstrably done that work, with the evidence attached. Holding the vehicle isn’t the same as having done the work, and we never let it count as if it were.

“Unknown” is a real answer here. If we can’t see a company deeply enough to call something a gap, we say so instead of colouring it red.

intelligent.win/intelligence/gap-finder

Capability coverage against a real pursuit — every area the work calls for marked covered, partial or gap, with teaming candidates ranked by how many of those gaps they actually cover. A plain count, never a fit score.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

Showing the top of the page — full capture 5,838px tall, expand for all of it.

One contract. One decision.

Start from a contract you’re already tracking and get the whole recompete picture on one page: how much runway is actually left, what the government asked for in its own words, what the incumbent has done at that office, and which companies could credibly compete for it.

Included with Growth and Enterprise accounts. A customer asked us for it, we built it, and we’re shaping the rest of it with them.

Read the full walkthrough →

intelligent.win/intelligence/recompete-brief

A single contract read end to end for one decision — including the government’s own requirements, quoted verbatim from its scope document.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

Showing the top of the page — full capture 10,879px tall, expand for all of it.

Size the market before you chase it.

Pick a NAICS code and an agency and see what the government actually spends there — the total, the trend year over year, who’s winning it, and how much of it goes out as a set-aside. Filter down to the slice you can genuinely bid on by business size and socio-economic status. No narrative, no summary, no model — just the numbers, with the look-back window printed on every chart.

intelligent.win/intelligence/naics

Size a market before chasing it: total spend, yearly trend, top companies and set-aside mix for any NAICS.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

Showing the top of the page — full capture 2,201px tall, expand for all of it.

Put two companies side by side.

Pick any two companies and see their revenue, capabilities, customer base, and trajectory next to each other, on the same scale — the comparison a capture team usually has to build by hand in a spreadsheet.

intelligent.win/intelligence/compare

Two companies side by side — portfolio counts, revenue and award mix, capability evidence dollar-for-dollar, and customer overlap. Evidence, never a fit score.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

Showing the top of the page — full capture 2,864px tall, expand for all of it.

What is this work really costing per hour billed?

Composite $/hr, computed from the government’s own reported hours and dollars on a contract — not a forecast, ever. Year-over-year is the actual percentage change against the prior year, never a fitted trend line.

Included with Growth and Enterprise accounts.

Read the full walkthrough →

intelligent.win/intelligence/labor-rate

Composite hourly rate for one contract, derived from contractor-reported labor hours — five reported fiscal years here, escalating an average of 3.4% a year. Every year-over-year figure is the actual change against the prior year, never a fitted trend line, and the 1,920 hrs/yr FTE divisor is stated as an assumption, not a fact.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

Showing the top of the page — full capture 1,920 × 1,497, expand for all of it.

Where does what you’ve already done fit, right now?

Pick any company — yours or someone else’s — and fan its own demonstrated capabilities outward across every posted solicitation, expiring contract, and OTA/CSO task call open today. No coverage percentage and no fit score: the count of what matched is the ranking, dollars only break a tie. A quiet note on every row states the match basis in one sentence, never a bold badge or a facet of its own.

Pick any company — yours, a teaming partner’s, or the one you keep losing to. Seeing someone else’s fit is half the point.

intelligent.win/intelligence/opportunity-match

A company’s own demonstrated capabilities fanned outward across posted solicitations, expiring contracts and open task calls — each row leading with how many of its capability areas that work actually calls for.

In this image: real federal opportunities — posted solicitations, expiring contracts and task calls — carrying their real notice numbers, as filed. The company matched against them is fictional, and so are its figures.

Showing the top of the page — full capture 5,137px tall, expand for all of it.

Other Transactions · New

The fastest-growing lane in defense buying, and almost nobody maps it.

Other Transaction agreements are how the Defense Department buys prototypes now: $2.3 billion obligated in FY2017, $19.2 billion in FY2024. Most of it flows through consortia — member organizations that run the competition on the government’s behalf — and almost none of it looks like a normal contract when you go looking for it. We loaded the whole federal OT record, FY2017 through today, and gave consortia the same treatment we give IDIQ vehicles: their own pages, their own award flow, their own rosters. And the Commercial Solutions Openings behind them — each open CSO with its topics, quoted from the government’s own posting, and marked when a topic is withdrawn.

Included with Growth and Enterprise accounts

Two sources, labelled, never blended.

The federal record is thin here, and not by accident… A name from a published roster never sits next to a dollar figure.

intelligent.win/consortium/mcdc

An OT consortium — the manager of record behind the public brand, award flow by fiscal year and agency, and a roster that keeps federally-attributed performers separate from the consortium’s own published member list.

In this image: companies are fictional and dollar figures are illustrative. Agencies, buying offices and codes are the real federal record; any contract number shown is altered so it resolves to nothing.

Showing the top of the page — full capture 3,022px tall, expand for all of it.

Budget Intelligence · New

Everyone reads the solicitation. We read the budget behind it.

We read and analyze the budget so you don’t have to.

A solicitation tells you what the government is buying this quarter. The budget tells you what it plans to buy for the next three years — and it’s published, in the open, in documents almost nobody in capture reads. So we read them. Federal accounts and what’s still unobligated in each one. Every agency’s obligation pace, month by month, against the same month a year earlier. And the defense budget justification books — the J-Books — down to the program element, with the R-1 and P-1 exhibit lines behind them. Real terms, because those are the words the people who work this use; hover any one of them for a plain-English explanation if you’ve never had to read an R-1 before.

Where we stop

We show a balance and a clock. You draw the conclusion. Nothing here says “underspent,” “behind pace,” or “at risk,” and no account gets a traffic light — a comparison is always the same fiscal period against the same fiscal period, and it says which period on its face.

01Its own tool
Go looking for it directly — federal account balances, agency obligation pace, and the J-Books, searchable and filterable on their own terms.
02On a buying office’s page
Which federal accounts that office’s work is actually executed from, each carrying its own balance — because no government source states “this office’s budget,” and we won’t be the first to.
03On a contract record
A Funded from band naming the accounts the award drew on — deliberately thin: the government’s own account-to-award file covers a fraction of contracts today, so most contract pages show no band at all rather than an empty one.
intelligent.win/intelligence/budget

Federal account balances as published — unobligated balance, budget authority and object class, every figure stamped with the reporting period it was drawn from.

In this image: federal budget and appropriation figures exactly as the government publishes them. Nothing here is rescaled, and no company appears.

Showing the top of the page — full capture 1,280px tall, expand for all of it.

Written from the record, not around it.

Where we summarize a company’s profile or trajectory, it’s guided synthesis — the judgment behind it comes from people who have led federal capture for decades — their rules, written down, with AI doing the writing. The dates, dollars, and counts are sourced data, not model output; the narrative is our synthesis on top of them, built to stay close to what the record shows. Worth a second look before it goes into a pursuit decision.

What’s Included

All of this, from your first login.

Company intelligence across the full federal services universe — profiles, evidence-ranked capabilities, revenue, leadership, and trajectory for more than 55,000 companies. Customer and buying-office intelligence for more than 22,000 federal offices — vendor rosters, contract mix, competition intensity, and active contracts with named contacts. Full contract-level records and the Federal Services Leaderboard. The capture workflow — watchlists, pursuits, notes you keep private or share with your team, and account ownership. The Intelligence Tools above: Gap Analysis, Capability → Opportunity Match, NAICS Market Discovery, Compare, and Budget Intelligence. Open opportunities and expiring contracts in one place, the IDIQ vehicles beyond the five we go deep on, and every published justification for limiting competition. Exports of any of it, and a monthly digest of what moved on what you track. And the Other Transaction record and the consortia behind it, the Recompete Brief, and Composite Labor Rate.

Bonus — Inside a Vehicle

Specialized intelligence where a company holds a vehicle.

When a company holds a position on one of these, we go a layer deeper: exact standing, SINs or domains, vehicle-scoped awards, and the trend behind them.

LIVE
GSA MAS
13,504
Awardees
LIVE
OASIS+
2,332
Awardees
LIVE
STARS III
223
Awardees · 8(a)
LIVE
VETS 2
37
Awardees · SDVOSB
LIVE
Polaris
111
Awardees · Ramping
COMING SOON
Alliant 3
—
Phase 1 awarded · page opens when the roster is complete
217,992other IDIQs, GWACs & BPAs·301,010 seat holders

Behind the five we go deep on, every one of these is browsable, rankable and analyzable — even where we haven’t gone a layer deeper on standing and trend.

Awardee counts as of the 6 September 2026 federal data release. More vehicle lenses are in the works — we’ll announce them as rosters are loaded, not before.

The Work We Take Off Your Desk

Days of digging, already done.

Every row below is a job your team does by hand today. On the left, the job. On the right, where it is already waiting. Save hours on every pursuit.

To Answer This ElsewhereIn Intelligent Win
Pull a company’s award history, read the PWS/SOWs, tag its capabilities yourselfOne profile, capabilities already extracted and tiered by evidence
Query a buying office in USASpending, export, pivot, chase down the contactsOne customer page: who wins, how they buy, how competitive, active contracts + contacts
Open each modification to reconstruct a contract’s historyOne contract page: every mod in order, competition posture, contacts, vehicle lineage
Build your own rollups to rank the marketA federal services leaderboard, already ranked on funded dollars
Jump between tools and re-key UEIs to connect the dotsOne search box across all of it: company ↔ customer ↔ contract ↔ vehicle, cross-linked, one click deep
Trust that the tool reconciled its numbersWe cross-check our own figures against USASpending’s public records, and say so when the record is thin
Read the PWS yourself and guess whether your team covers itGap Analysis: capability by capability, with the evidence, and an honest “unknown” where we can’t see far enough
Watch a recompete date in a spreadsheet and hope you started early enoughOne brief per contract: clock, scope in the government’s own words, incumbent footprint, and who else could compete
Give up on Other Transaction work because it doesn’t look like a contractConsortium pages, member rosters, and the OT record itself, labelled by where each fact came from
Hope a sole-source justification happens to surface on a contract you’re already watchingEvery published justification for limiting competition, in one searchable place: authority cited, office, date, and the government’s own stated grounds
Download the comptroller’s PDFs and read the budget justification books yourselfFederal account balances, agency obligation pace, and the J-Books, searchable, at their own reporting period
Rebuild the same summary by hand every time a review comes aroundExport the profile, the ranking, the requirement matrix, or any result list: formatted, sourced, and stamped with its own data vintage

Sources: USASpending, FPDS, SAM.gov, GSA eLibrary and the government’s own published documents, checked and refreshed every month.

Who It’s For

Everything your capture team needs. Nothing they don’t.

Built for the people who treat business development as a discipline, not a hope.

Capture Manager
“I need to know who’s really covering this requirement before I write a single page, not just who’s parked on the vehicle.”
BD Executive
“Trajectory tells me where a competitor is headed, not just where they’ve been. That’s the difference between a wasted pursuit and a smart one.”
Teaming Lead
“When I need a partner with a specific capability and a specific customer relationship, I need to find them in minutes, not days.”
Owner / Executive
“I need to know where to invest the next bid dollar before I commit the team.”

Pricing

Every plan includes the full company database and all live vehicles.

Founder-rate pricing, held for your first two years. Start your trial today and lock it in.

Start with 14 days of full Growth access: every tool, every vehicle, real data. At the end of it, pick the plan that fits.

Emerging
The Databases
$60 /seat/mo
or $50/seat/mo billed annually
Everything you need to look anything up.
Most Popular
Growth
The Tools
$120 /seat/mo
or $100/seat/mo billed annually
Everything above, plus the tools you decide with.
Enterprise
The Team
Talk to us
Talk to us about your whole team. 3-seat minimum.
Databases
Intelligence Tools
Capture Reports
Finished, board-grade documents the platform builds FOR your team: time saved, not data exported. Different from Exports below.
Capture Workspace & Team
Data Tools
Support & Account

Included in this planComing soon: on this plan’s roadmap, not available yetNot in this plan

*Claude tested and proven. MCP is an open standard; other AI tools may work.

Sign up yourself, or have us set your team up. Either way, when you write in you reach the people who build it. Team pricing is set per person, and not everyone on a capture team needs the same thing. Tell us who needs what and we’ll quote it.

Try it on your next pursuit.

Start free and you are in today. Or let us walk your own pipeline through it with you.