Market Note · 27 September 2026

3 in 10 Stand-Alone Federal Services Awards Drew One Offer

When a federal agency competed a new stand-alone services contract in FY2025, only one company bid 29.8% of the time. The share has barely moved in six years. It is highest in IT and R&D, lowest in construction and transportation, and it does not fall away on big contracts.

Intelligent Win · Market Intelligence — measured on intelligent.win’s contract corpus.

Data as of6 September 2026 federal data releaseFY2020–FY2025 are completed fiscal years; FY2026 covers 1 October 2025 – 31 May 2026, the last month complete across every agency in this release

In FY2025, federal agencies signed 37,609 new stand-alone services contracts that the government’s own record codes as competed. 11,225 of them drew exactly one offer.

That is 29.8%. Roughly three competitions in ten had one bidder.

It is not a bad year. Over the six completed fiscal years we can measure, the share has never been lower than 29.8% or higher than 34.1%.

FY2026 so far looks the same. From October through May, 3,937 of 14,027 competed stand-alone services contracts drew one offer: 28.1%, against 29.3% for the same eight months of FY2025. FY2026 runs through May: the 6 September 2026 federal data release carries defense awards only through early June, so May is the last month complete across every agency. We compare it with October–May of FY2025, not the whole year, because the first eight months of a year run slightly lower than the full year.

October–May New competed stand-alone services contracts Drew one offer Share
FY2025 17,689 5,185 29.3%
FY2026 14,027 3,937 28.1%

In each of the past six years the full-year share finished 0.2 to 2.2 points above the October-to-May share; if FY2026 follows that pattern it would end between about 28.3% and 30.2%.

Bar chart of the single-offer share by fiscal year: FY2020 31.9%, FY2021 33.1%, FY2022 34.1%, FY2023 33.1%, FY2024 30.0%, FY2025 29.8% in gold, and a hatched partial FY2026 bar for October to May at 28.1%, with a shaded band from 28.3% to 30.2% above it.
FY2020–FY2025 are full years. The hatched FY2026 bar is October–May; the shaded band is where FY2026 would land if its full-year finish follows the past six years' 0.2–2.2-point pattern. As of the 6 September 2026 federal data release (USASpending / FPDS).
29.8%
Drew a single offer
11,225 of 37,609 contracts
29.5%
Of non-construction contracts worth $10M+
140 of 474
36.1%
IT contracts worth $1M+
33.5% research and development

New competed stand-alone federal services contracts, FY2025, by the number of offers recorded on the award.

Six years, nearly flat

Fiscal year New competed stand-alone services contracts Drew one offer Share
FY2020 53,651 17,136 31.9%
FY2021 49,800 16,461 33.1%
FY2022 47,544 16,226 34.1%
FY2023 45,010 14,888 33.1%
FY2024 43,637 13,089 30.0%
FY2025 37,609 11,225 29.8%
Bar chart of the share of new competed stand-alone federal services contracts that drew a single offer: FY2020 31.9%, FY2021 33.1%, FY2022 34.1%, FY2023 33.1%, FY2024 30.0%, and FY2025 29.8% in gold.
Base actions of stand-alone contracts coded as competed. As of the 6 September 2026 federal data release (USASpending / FPDS).

Where one offer is most common

The kind of work matters more than anything else we tested. On contracts with a potential value of $1 million or more, FY2025:

Kind of work Contracts Drew one offer Share FY2023–FY2025 pooled
IT and telecom services 144 52 36.1% 33.7%
Research and development 1,947 652 33.5% 32.1%
Equipment maintenance and repair 252 50 19.8% 20.6%
Professional and support services 326 61 18.7% 20.4%
Medical services 126 18 14.3% 18.6%
Real-property maintenance and repair 545 59 10.8% 12.0%
Utilities and housekeeping 215 23 10.7% 9.6%
Construction of structures 639 60 9.4% 10.4%
Transportation and travel 120 11 9.2% 11.2%

Families with fewer than 100 contracts in FY2025 are left out of this table. The pooled three-year column is there to show the ordering is not a one-year accident.

Horizontal bar chart of the single-offer share for FY2025 competed stand-alone contracts worth $1 million or more, by kind of work: IT and telecom 36.1%, research and development 33.5% in gold, equipment maintenance 19.8%, professional and support 18.7%, medical 14.3%, real-property maintenance 10.8%, utilities and housekeeping 10.7%, construction 9.4%, transportation 9.2%.
Kind of work = the first letter of the product-or-service code. As of the 6 September 2026 federal data release (USASpending / FPDS).

The first thing we did was try to break it

  • Construction. Construction and real-property maintenance draw more bidders (13.6% single-offer in FY2025) and sit inside the standard services cut. Take them out and the share goes up: 32.4% in FY2025, between 32.3% and 36.5% in every year since FY2020.
  • Contract size. Most of the 37,609 are small. So we re-ran it by potential value at award, construction excluded. FY2025: under $250K 34.4%; $250K–$1M 21.2%; $1M–$10M 26.1%; $10M–$100M 31.3%; $100M and up 20.5% (16 of 78). Every band sits between 20% and 35%. On non-construction contracts worth $10M or more together, 29.5% (140 of 474). One offer is not a small-purchase quirk.
  • Basic research. Some research awards come from broad announcements where each proposal is its own. Removing the awards the record codes as basic research leaves the FY2025 figure at 29.9%.
  • Defense and civilian. On non-construction contracts worth $1M or more, FY2025: Department of Defense 30.4%, civilian agencies 15.9%. Part of that gap is the mix of work — defense buys far more research and development — but defense runs higher within the same kinds of work too (research and development: 34.2% vs 23.8%).
  • Set-aside or not. Among the same defense contracts, full and open competitions drew one offer 38.6% of the time, competitions restricted to a class of firms (mostly small-business set-asides) 30.2%. Civilian: 18.1% and 13.4%. Restricting the field did not produce more single-bid competitions.

What this does and does not say

It says roughly three in ten competed stand-alone federal services contracts had one bidder, every year for six years and so far in FY2026, and that IT and research work carry the highest shares.

It does not say anything was wrong with any of these competitions. One offer can mean a narrow requirement, a short response window, an incumbent nobody chose to challenge, or a market with few qualified firms. The record tells us how many offers arrived, not why.

It does not cover task and delivery orders under existing contract vehicles. Those carry most federal services dollars, but the offer count is blank on 44.1% of new competed services orders in the record, so any single-offer rate for orders would describe the half that got filled in, not the market.

This piece stops at government-wide totals. Which offices see the most single-bid competitions, and who wins them, is where the platform picks up.

Methodology
·Source. USASpending prime contract transactions, as published in the 6 September 2026 federal data release. Measured on intelligent.win’s contract corpus.
·Population. The base action (modification number 0) of every stand-alone contract — no parent contract vehicle — whose product or service code begins with a letter (the standard services cut, which includes construction and research), fiscal years FY2020–FY2025, plus FY2026 from 1 October 2025 through 31 May 2026. 97.7% of new stand-alone services contracts in FY2025 carry a base action in the record; the rest are counted only from later actions and are not in this measure.
·Competed. The government’s “extent competed” field reads full and open competition, full and open after exclusion of sources, competed under simplified acquisition procedures, follow-on to a competed action, or competitive delivery order.
·One offer. The “number of offers received” field on the base action equals 1. The field is populated on every contract in this population.
·Contract size. “Base and all options value” on the base action — the potential value at award, not what has been obligated since.
·Kind of work. The first letter of the product or service code.
·FY2026 window. Ends 31 May 2026, the last month complete across every agency in this release. Defense award actions in the release drop 78% from May to June 2026, the defense reporting delay rather than a real decline; civilian June is at its normal level. FY2026 is compared only with October–May of FY2025.
·Defense = awarding agency Department of Defense; civilian = every other awarding agency.
·Company and office names. None appear. Every figure is an aggregate.
·Not included. Orders under contract vehicles (see above), contracts coded as not competed, grants, and Other Transaction agreements.

These numbers came out of the platform, not a spreadsheet.
The same contract corpus behind this note — 2.6 million contracts, reconciled against the government’s own published totals before anything publishes — is what the product runs on. If you want to see how it’s assembled and checked, that’s written up in full.